Thursday, 17 December 2009
Thursday, 2 July 2009
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
EURO ELECTIONS 2009
ARE VOTING FOR A
POLITICIAN WHO WILL
STAND UP FOR
SCOTLAND'S RIGHTS
Did you know 6,000 MILES
OF SCOTTISH SEA
was made ENGLISH in 1999
by the Lib / Lab Pack
or do you want to
be represented by
a Political Puppet of
a London based Party
A MEP who will be powerless
when the Conservatives get in
http://www.oilofscotland.org
Sunday, 15 February 2009
The Devil's Kitchen: More on Smith fraudulent expenses claims...
HTTP://WWW.OILOFSCOTLAND.ORG
North Sea Oil will last for another 100 years according to industry anaylists
Oil is the UK's Largest Industry landing, 700,000 barrels of oil per day
Scotland gets NO Oil Revenues - Scotland is funded, only by population taxes
Scottish Oil is worth £22,831 a minute, £32 million a day, £12 billion a year
Scotland could build 2 High Schools or 16 wind turbines a day with it's VAST oil revenue, if it did not give it to LONDON. In 66 days Scotland's oil money could pay for the rebuilding all Scotland's High Schools or in 16 days the World's largest wind farm! Another day it could fund building 256 two bedroom houses to solve Scotland's chronic housing problems or it could also give each Premier Division Club each £2.66 Million
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secret plan to deprive independent Scotland of North Sea oil fields
In 1999 Westminster moved Scotland's Marine Boundaries from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Carnoustie. Illegally making 6000 miles of Scotland's waters English
Documents detailing secret government plans in the 1970s to prevent Scotland laying claim to North Sea oil have been seen by The Times. They show the extraordinary lengths to which civil servants were prepared to go to head off devolution, which was seen then as inevitably leading to independence.
When you play golf at St Andrews and look way out to sea, you are looking at English Waters according to the treacherous Westminster powers that be.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1979 Devolution Referendum - 52% said YES Westminster said NO on 1 March 1979 the People were asked this question? 'Do you want the provisions of the Scotland Act 1978 to be put into effect ? '
Scotland voted in favor of devolution by 52% to 48%
However, after the Referendum had taken place SDP, MP George Cunningham had proposed that 40 % of the electorate must vote Yes, thus effectively counting abstainers as No voters. 32.9% of the electorate had voted Yes.
Had the same conditions been imposed on the 1975 EEC referendum, Scotland would have left the EEC.
The Act was repealed the following month (March 1979) despite Scottish MP's voting 43 to 19 against repeal.
This is the first time in a democracy that the decision of the voters who turned out has been over turned. Even in a third world African Nation, democracy is not destroyed to the extent as it was in 1979 by Labour Government of Westminster.
The extreme actions of the Labour party in 1979 should be examined by the United Nations, as how can the Western Developed World enforce Democracy when Westminster, London has overturned a democratic decision of the Scottish People and decsision of 43 to 19 MP's of Scotland, wanting to stop this undemocratic decision, that stopped the Scottish People having the devolved Scottish Parliament they had said YES to.
The sense of betrayal that the Scottish electorate felt was unrecoverable for the Labour Party and a vote of no confidence in Callaghan's Labour government 27 days later was carried by one vote. The Labour Government collapsed and Margaret Thatcher swept to power where the Conservatives remained until 1997 despite having virtually no support in Scotland.
http://www.oilofscotland.org/scottish_politics.html#1979
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saturday, 7 February 2009
Tuesday, 26 August 2008
Iain Dale's Diary: SNP Select Glenrothes By Election Candidate
6,000 MILES OF SCOTLAND'S SEA WAS STOLEN IN 1999
In 1999 Westminster moved Scotland's Marine Boundaries from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Carnoustie. Illegally making 6000 miles of Scotland's waters English.
When you play golf at St Andrews and look out to sea, you are looking at English Waters according to the treacherous Westminster powers that be.
There is a shocking fact that few people in Scotland or elsewhere know which is just as disgraceful as the 30 year Westminster administration and deceit over Scotland’s oil. This is the as-yet unexplained and secret action by Westminster Order in 1999 to move Scotland’s marine boundary from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Carnoustie. To this day this lost Scotland 6,000 square miles of the North Sea, nodded through at the time by the feckless and treacherous Lib/Lab arm of Westminster based in Holyrood.
The SNP tried to keep the Scottish boundaries intact but the Holyrood parliament, very much under the Westminster thumb, voted by a majority of eight votes to reject the SNP motion to reverse this loss. The boundary move, supposed to be only a change in the fishing boundary, breaches international law and such a move must only ever be achieved by agreement. Professor Iain Scobie of Glasgow University declared the move illegal and also declared that it was not in accordance with contemporary international law and practice. He added that he saw no basis for the move in law or logic. The fishing industry is 15 times more important to Scotland than to England. Even more important, although at present it is only the fishing boundary that has been moved, the expert legal opinion that declared the move illegal on three grounds, claiming the only logical reason for this was to put down “a likely marker for a similar transfer of oil and gas rights in the future”.
Traditionally, marine boundaries are internationally recognised as straight lines from a country’s border into the adjoining sea for a distance of 3 miles, over which each country has its own jurisdiction.
Richard Lochhead MSP requested to know the suspicious reasons behind this move, under the Freedom of Information Act, but this has been continually refused as “it would not be in the public interest”. To whose public interest do they refer? One can only hazard a guess at what that means. Interestingly the Tories backed the SNP over the sea boundary papers.
Consider this: if Westminster holds that the United Kingdom is, and always will be, one country, then there is clearly no need to tamper with any marine boundaries. If, on the other hand, it is recognised that Scotland’s independence is a possibility then, and only then, is there any Westminster purpose and reason for this move. It is unimaginable that any country has the right to alter and claim the marine or land boundary of another country, and don’t forget that Scotland is a nation in its own right.
N D Gibb
Before you vote read the top secret mccrone oil report
It is your 32 Million a Day Stop giving it away. http://www.oilofscotland.org
6,000 MILES OF SCOTLAND'S SEA WAS STOLEN IN 1999
6,000 MILES OF SCOTLAND'S SEA WAS STOLEN IN 1999
In 1999 Westminster moved Scotland's Marine Boundaries from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Carnoustie. Illegally making 6000 miles of Scotland's waters English.
When you play golf at St Andrews and look out to sea, you are looking at English Waters according to the treacherous Westminster powers that be.
There is a shocking fact that few people in Scotland or elsewhere know which is just as disgraceful as the 30 year Westminster administration and deceit over Scotland’s oil. This is the as-yet unexplained and secret action by Westminster Order in 1999 to move Scotland’s marine boundary from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Carnoustie. To this day this lost Scotland 6,000 square miles of the North Sea, nodded through at the time by the feckless and treacherous Lib/Lab arm of Westminster based in Holyrood.
The SNP tried to keep the Scottish boundaries intact but the Holyrood parliament, very much under the Westminster thumb, voted by a majority of eight votes to reject the SNP motion to reverse this loss. The boundary move, supposed to be only a change in the fishing boundary, breaches international law and such a move must only ever be achieved by agreement. Professor Iain Scobie of Glasgow University declared the move illegal and also declared that it was not in accordance with contemporary international law and practice. He added that he saw no basis for the move in law or logic. The fishing industry is 15 times more important to Scotland than to England. Even more important, although at present it is only the fishing boundary that has been moved, the expert legal opinion that declared the move illegal on three grounds, claiming the only logical reason for this was to put down “a likely marker for a similar transfer of oil and gas rights in the future”.
Traditionally, marine boundaries are internationally recognised as straight lines from a country’s border into the adjoining sea for a distance of 3 miles, over which each country has its own jurisdiction.
Richard Lochhead MSP requested to know the suspicious reasons behind this move, under the Freedom of Information Act, but this has been continually refused as “it would not be in the public interest”. To whose public interest do they refer? One can only hazard a guess at what that means. Interestingly the Tories backed the SNP over the sea boundary papers.
Consider this: if Westminster holds that the United Kingdom is, and always will be, one country, then there is clearly no need to tamper with any marine boundaries. If, on the other hand, it is recognised that Scotland’s independence is a possibility then, and only then, is there any Westminster purpose and reason for this move. It is unimaginable that any country has the right to alter and claim the marine or land boundary of another country, and don’t forget that Scotland is a nation in its own right.
N D Gibb
Before you vote read the top secret mccrone oil report
It is your 32 Million a Day Stop giving it away. http://www.oilofscotland.org
